New and revived aging in place/community villages in the Albany suburbs of Bethlehem and Clifton Park have formed in recent months and other groups are meeting in the Schenectady suburb of Niskayuna as well as northern Columbia County to plan villages. A steering committee has also been meeting in the City of Albany to consider how and where a potential village or villages would operate in city neighborhoods. There is already a NNORC (Neighborhood Naturally Occurring Retirement Community) that has been operating for many years by Jewish Family Services in a part of the city.
Senior Services of Albany is also sponsoring Livingston Village in a renovated middle school turned into apartments. Community Caregivers based in Guilderland, a suburb of Albany, has been providing village type services for over two decades and it is partnering to provide those services with Bethlehem Neighbors which recently was revived with a new Executive Committee after a dormant period. Community Caregivers is also working with the Albany steering committee to consider partnering with a possible village there.
The Albany Guardian Society has played a key role in the development and support for villages, holding bi-monthly meetings for groups in the eastern part of the state. Now, the Guardian Society has contracted with the New York State Office for the Aging (NYSOFA) to hire staff and run a Villages Technical Assistance Center (VTAC). Last year, the Guardian Society was the conduit for small village seed grants to four communities that came from NYSOFA.
The national Village to Village Network has grown to over 200 grassroots communities seeking to develop services and social supports to enable older persons to remain living independently. A national conference is held every year and local groups are gaining expertise and skills in how to help residents with transportation, home repair services, friendly visiting, health education and social activities.
The 2020 race for the Democratic nomination is likely to have more than a dozen significant candidates though maybe only half that number will be serious contenders. Many are enthusiastically embracing a single payer Medicare for All plan as they seek to court the party’s more liberal voters. Senator Bernie Sanders made the issue a priority in his 2016 campaign and if he runs again he will be leading the battle again though there are others who want to share the issue.
However, as the campaign is already beginning to unfold some candidates are being forced to spell out what their plan would entail and whether they would support the single payer idea and get rid of private insurance. Some more moderate Democrats may not be willing to go there with Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio saying it is bad politics. He is saying that improving the Affordable Care Act by providing a public option and lowering the Medicare age to 55 or lower to begin with are better starting points. He and others are noting the ferocious opposition to the Affordable Care Act that, in part, cost the Democrats control of Congress in 2010 and anticipate a full onslaught not only by private insurance companies but by doctors and other providers.
So, it will be interesting to see where the current frontrunner in the polls, former Vice President Joseph Biden, comes down if he decides to run. He takes a more pragmatic approach on many issues and he may opt not to fully embrace Medicare for All. Others like former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg who sees himself as a centrist has rejected Medicare for All as too expensive and impractical. Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand are closer to the Bernie Sanders position.
Older voters who already have Medicare are concerned about maintaining it and giving the government the power to negotiate the price of prescription drugs in Medicare Part D. Many seniors are also very politically active supporting the single payer plan.
Recent polling shows support for Medicare for All but that support drops significantly when respondents are told that private insurance would not be part of it. For Democrats supporting Medicare for All they will have a lot of educating to do with the public in order to convince them to support such a bold change in the status quo. Health care has always been a political quagmire for those seeking to change it.
I was saddened by the recent death of Harris Wofford, the Senator from Pennsylvania and former aide to Martin Luther King and JFK who I became friends with when I was Director of the New York State Office for the Aging. He worked with Sargent Shriver getting the Peace Corps going and he came to meet me when he was working for the Experience Wave to promote civic engagement and voluntarism for older persons. He was a remarkable man who played a key role not only in the founding of the Peace Corps but also VISTA, Americorps and the Senior Corps which includes the RSVP program (Retired Senior and Volunteer Program) and the Foster Grandparents program.
His 92 years included time as a child when he toured India with his grandmother and saw Gandhi and studied and promoted his non-violent philosophy. He became an advisor to Martin Luther King and was credited with getting Presidential candidate John F. Kennedy to to call Coretta Scott King while Martin Luther King was in jail in 1960. He wrote of his experiences with these two icons in his book, Of Kennedys and Kings.
Writing in the Washington Post after Wofford’s death, columnist Michael Gerson said, “Wofford’s theory of social change is compelling. It speaks to the individual. No life lived in service to others is empty. Service is a good way to launch young people into responsible adulthood. A good way for seniors to share undiminished wisdom and skills A good way for anyone to give purpose to their freedom and direction to their gifts.”
Harris Wofford was a good and great man who was a role model of how to impact society and public life in a positive, civil and unifying way.
The House Government Oversight Committee, now chaired by Congressman Elijah Cummings of Maryland has written letters to a dozen major drug companies asking for information about their drug pricing policies. Democrats are vowing to make lowering drug prices a major goal in the House.
“For years, drug companies have been aggressively increasing prices on existing drugs and setting higher launch prices for new drugs while recording windfall profits,” Cummings said in a statement. “The goals of this investigation are to determine why drug companies are increasing prices so dramatically, how drug companies are using the proceeds, and what steps can be taken to reduce prescription drug prices.”
Meanwhile, Democrats in the House are considering a number of actions to address high drug prices for all consumers as well as ways to lower prices through Medicare and using other government powers. These options include:
-cap out of pocket costs
-negotiate Medicare drug prices
-more generic drugs to market
-use foreign pricing as reference for US prices
-rebuild patent system
-have the government produce some drugs
-import drugs from Canada
The Trump Administration has also made reducing drug prices a priority and Donald Trump suggested that foreign prices could be used as a basis for pricing in this country. He also wants to promote changes in Medicare pricing and approve more generic drugs.
Five Democrats have taken over as chairs of key committees in the House of Representatives. Three will chair powerful committees on budget, foreign policy and judicial issues. Nita Lowey of Westchester is chair of the powerful Appropriations Committee which is the key committee deciding on program funding across all government programs including aging programs of which she has been a major supporter.
Eliot Engel is chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee which will have a role in probing the Trump Administration relationships with Russia and Saudi Arabia and other countries. Jerry Nadler is chair of the powerful Judiciary Committee which would have the role of initiating any impeachment proceedings against Trump.
Carolyn Maloney of Manhattan is chair of the Joint Economic Committee and Nydia Velasquez is chairing the Small Business Committee. She was the first Puerto Rican woman elected to Congress in 1992.
Nadler and Engel were prominent members of the New York State Assembly for many years. Nadler served from 1977-1992 and Engel from 1977-1992. Nita Lowey worked for Governor Mario Cuomo in several roles before she went to Congress. All of the chairs are considered to be among the more progressive members of the House.
Once again following an election turnover, there are new chairs of the Aging Committees in the state Assembly and Senate. In the Senate, the change was expected since Democrats took power and would appoint one of their members to replace Senator Sue Serino, the previous chair. Senator Rachel May who just won election in the Syracuse area is the new Senate chair. She has been a professor at Stony Brook and worked at Syracuse University in the environmental field most recently .
Assemblyman Harry Bronson is the new Assembly chair, replacing Donna Lupardo who is now chairing the Agriculture Committee. She had been mentioned for the post of Majority Leader which instead went to Crystal Peoples-Stokes of Buffalo. Bronson represents a district in the Rochester area and has been in the Assembly since 2011.
Both Lupardo and Serino were active leaders of the Aging Committee. Unfortunately, there is also a lot of turnover in chairs of the committee who often move up to other committees that are more powerful. There have been some chairs who served for many years like Paul Harenberg in the Assembly who made senior issues his primary concern.
Gustavo Rivera has replaced Kemp Hannon as Chair of the Senate Health Committee as Democrats replace all Republican chairs. Hannon was defeated in November. Assemblyman Richard Gottfried continues as Chair of the Health, a position he has held for decades.
The new Legislature which begins its session now includes 15 new members of the Senate. The Legislature will be much more diverse with more women and persons of different ethnic groups, including the first Indian-American, Iranian-American and Taiwanese-American legislators.
New York’s paid family leave program has entered its second year and continues the phase in of benefits as well as length of time a worker can take the benefit. Starting January 1st, 2019, benefits expanded from 8 to 10 weeks of leave at 55% of wages up to $746.41 per week. The employee contribution goes up to a maximum of $2.08/week, and many workers will pay less than this amount. These benefits will grow and be further phased in until 2021 when they will reach 12 weeks of leave at 67% of wages up to a cap.
The program provides job protection to return to the same or a comparable position. There is also protection against discrimination or retaliation for taking the leave and a continuation of the same health insurance policy for workers taking paid family leave as long as employees continue paying their cost sharing. For more detailed information on how the program works, here is a link to the state’s website https://paidfamilyleave.ny.gov/
I am trying to get some data on the number of persons who used the program in 2018, the first year of operation. It will be interesting to see how many persons used the benefit for caregiving for a sick relative as well as those using it for caring for a newborn and care when a family member went on a military assignment. Paid family leave is also available for parents adopting a child and can be available for “pending” adoption when needs before the adoption require a parent to be out of work.